Sunday, March 15, 2020

95. New York City - International Women's Day Celebration

Mar. 15, 2020
Coffee Project NY's certified coffee lab hosed the Mar. 8 event.
Last week, March 8, was the official International Women's Day (IWD). Lots of groups celebrate empowerment of women all month long, so hopefully this post inspires you to participate in any way you can!

An exciting event took place in New York City on March 8 with a bunch of coffee people. CoffeeFest NYC was the reason many of us were in the Big Apple and the rest of the 20 people who joined were from the area.

The collaborative effort started with a few phone calls between Artisan Coffee Imports and roasters across the country, dreaming up IWD event ideas.  On the phone with Amaris Gutierrez-Ray, founder of @womenincoffeeproject and a roaster @JoeCoffee in New York, the idea sparked to have a documentary film screening at a cool New York space. Amaris reached out to Chisum Ngai ("Sum"), owner and founder of @coffeeprojectNY who readily agreed to donate her spacious, brand-new roasting plant / espresso bar / certified SCA training lab in Queens for the evening! Amaris dipped into her amazing network again to find exciting panel speakers to follow-up the film, including Lane Mitchell of @cafefemininocoffee and Gabriela Figueroa-Hueck of @ramacafenicaragua in Nicaragua (who, unfortunately, had to cancel at the last minute). Yours truly (Ruth Ann Church) agreed to be on the panel and Amaris moderated.

The evening began with networking / happy hour time with wine, cheese and crackers and tasting of brewed women-grown coffees. The 20 guests included journalists, Lisa Espenshade of Grounds for Health, Andrea Pacas from El Salvador, baristas from NY and places as far away as Connecticut and coffee company owners from Virgina and Georgia. It was tough to pull away from conversations and let the one hour movie begin. 
The film weaves together beautiful scenery and stories of several different coffee-growing families in Oaxaca, Mexico along with commentary from the importing / roasting / consuming side of the coffee value chain. 

Panel Discussion After the Film
After the film, the moderated discussion highlighted the complexity of improving women's empowerment in communities like this one in Oaxaca. One participant asked if all coffee communities have men who are as supportive of women's rights as those who are interviewed in the film. Lane Mitchell, Cafe Feminino Coffee, confirmed that supportive men, unfortunately, are still the exception in rural communities of most coffee-producing countries where she visits. Still, they exist and the more they are supported for their belief in equity by roasters who buy their coffee, the more likely these beliefs will spread quickly.
Sum (L) and Lane (R)




Another discussion point between the panel and the audience was where the "onus" lies in the coffee value chain to spark changes. Is it with the consumer, as one industry leader proposes in the film? One participant thought that is naive and that the consumer expects those with power, large roasters and importers, to generate the initiatives that drive change. In the end, there was concensus that everyone can do something in their own community at their spot in the value chain. Even just talking about the importance of gender equity in all communities is building awareness that makes a difference!


MC Amaris introduces the film.

Donations Needed!
Kimberly Easson of Partnership for Gender Equity remarks during the film that while roasters today make substantial investments in sustainability of coffee, comparatively few dollars are ever invested in coffee gender equity work. Therefore the organizers took up a collection and recently announced $125 was donated by the small crowd to the Partnership for Gender Equity.

For those who would like to make a further financial gift, the following non-profit organizations are suggested:


(Lto R) Amaris, Sum, Ruth Ann, Lane



THANK YOU to all who came to the Mar. 8 event. We hope to participate in a similar effort next year!








Wednesday, February 12, 2020

94. Cost of Production - the basis for understanding price

Feb. 12, 2020
Adele (L), a coffee farmer in Rwanda,
talks with researcher Ruth Ann (R).
Cost of production (CoP) is an accounting term. It refers to the "cost of production of any item or unit." Most definitions talk about three components of CoP:

  1. Raw material
  2. Direct labor costs
  3. Overhead costs (e.g. management salaries, office supplies)

CoP gives the accountant a value for the costs incurred to produce a product or service. Once CoP is known, then profitability of the product or service can be calculated more easily.

A long lamented issue in the coffee industry is the difficulty to get a measurement, a value, for CoP for 1 kg of green coffee. More and more, the discussions about the "price crisis" and "fair trade" are focusing on how problematic and core this issue is. Say Roaster X just paid $2.75/lb FOB, about $6.05/kg FOB for green coffee. Is it a good price? It might be. The correct answer depends completely on the producers' costs.

At Artisan Coffee Imports, we have a perspective on this problem that goes back to our automotive roots. I grew up in southeastern Michigan and in an earlier part of my career I was a non-profit adviser to small manufacturers supplying the big auto companies. The companies that did well were the ones that had a fairly good understanding of their CoP, which enabled them to have productive discussions with their buyers about price.

After getting started in coffee around 2007 and seeing the parallels in coffee's long supply chain, I was eager to work with those who could help me understand costs and prices. Fortunately, I had the opportunity to be part of an amazing research project, the Feed the Future Africa Great Lakes Coffee support program in Rwanda and Burundi, from 2015 - 2018. My participation on this project enabled me to live in Rwanda for a year, and to utilize a large, new dataset to define and analyze cost of production of coffee in Rwanda.

In short, I wrote my masters thesis for an M.S. in Community Sustainability degree from Michigan State University on this topic. "Estimating Farmer Cost of Production: Implications for Sustainable Growth in Rwanda’s Coffee Sector" is the title of this 65 page labor-of-love, completed in August 2017. I've recently been able to format at least the executive summary to be more reader friendly, and therefore would like to share a link to the entire document HERE.

Summary of a Masters' Thesis
In case readers of this blog do not have time to read a 65 page thesis, I'd like to share a few highlights here. Tables and graphs are often the most interesting parts of any research paper, so let's focus on a few of those. In the literature review, I share Table 2: a summary of the results of 10 different coffee cost of production studies from around the world.

Table 2:  Ten CoP studies with country and CoP result


Sorted by country, then highest to lowest CoP

Study #
Study (Author – year)
Country
CoP Result
US$ per lb. green coffee
1
USAID – AGLC – 2016
Rwanda
$0.64
2
Technoserve, 2011-2013
Rwanda
$0.26
3
NAEB – 1990s
Rwanda
$0.05
4
TMEA – Integrity – 2014
Burundi
$0.75
5b
COSA – 2015b
Costa Rica
$1.96
5c
COSA – 2015c
Guatemala
$1.32
5e
COSA – 2015e
Nicaragua
$0.92
5f
COSA – 2015f
India
$0.72
5g
COSA – 2015g
Vietnam
$0.52
5a
COSA – 2015a
Kenya
$1.52
6
Nyoro, Wanzla & Awuor 2001
Kenya
$0.68
8a
CIAT/CRS – 2015
Colombia – Narino – Off-farm
$2.38
9
IDH – Technoserve 2014
Colombia
$1.66
8b
CIAT/CRS – 2015
Colombia – Narino – Specialist
$1.58
8c
CIAT/CRS – 2015
Colombia – Narino Diversified
$1.40
5d
COSA – 2015d
Colombia
$1.12
8d
CIAT/CRS - 2015
Colombia nat’l avg.
$0.92
7a
Committee on Coffee Competitiveness, 2015
Colombia – state A
$0.83
10
CRECE-UTZ, 2014
Colombia
$0.78-$0.95
7b
Committee on Coffee Competitiveness, 2015
Colombia – state B
$0.72
7c
Committee on Coffee Competitiveness, 2015
Colombia – state C
$.68

Table 2 shows ten of the twenty or so papers reviewed for the study. The ten were selected because they give clear estimates of CoP. Using US$/lb green as a unit of measure to enable comparison, the range of values for Rwanda is $.05 to $.64. Integrity’s milestone study for Burundi estimated $.75/lb green for 2012. Estimates for Colombia range from $.68 - $2.38/lb green. This wide range of values can be attributed to both the underlying differences in costs across time and across regions and countries, as well as the variety of methodologies used in the estimation formulas.

After the literature review, we review the methodology of the research, especially the manner in which the survey was conducted in 2016. It was conducted with 1024 coffee farmer households randomly selected from farmer lists from 16 washing stations in 4 selected coffee-producing regions of Rwanda (Huye in the south, Rutsiro in the West, Kirehe in the East and Gakenke in the North.) So the calculation to understand the sample size of 1024 is 16 coffee washing stations x 64 farmers from each. This is a unique and extremely valuable database, providing the basis for establishing many new insights on Rwandan coffee, not just cost of production. Click here to see some of the publications that have already come out of this dataset!

CoP Punchline
To share the "punchline" first, we find the average CoP in Rwanda is 177/RWF/kg cherry (see Fig. 2 below). These costs for many farmer groups are higher than the average cherry prices being paid in Rwanda. This has serious implications for Rwanda’s long term production trend of specialty coffee. 177 RWF/KG cherry converts to $.64/lb. green, a more universally comparable metric, using Fx rate of 790 Rwf/$1 and cherry to green ratio of 6.4.

A key finding from the report is the confirmation that similar to other crops in many countries, cost of production in coffee in Rwanda tends to be lowest for the largest farms. The number of trees in on a coffee farm is significantly and inversely related to CoP (see Figure 1 below). It is recommended that this finding be used to guide both the design and the evaluation of farmer training programs. Programs should seek to target their resources to the size of farmer that will benefit most. 
Figure 1: CoP/Kg cherry is inversely related to number of trees in Rwanda.

CoP and Prices
More and more, the specialty coffee industry is realizing that programs and, importantly, pricing may need to be tailored by farm size to achieve sustainable margins in all size groups, (Trewick, 2015). For example, as shown in Figure 2 below, the floor price for cherry in Rwanda was set at 150 RWF at the beginning of the 2016 season (see line A in figure 2). On the left side of the graph, one can see how the smaller farmers will lose money when the cherry price is 150 RWF/kg cherry, whereas large farmers with 1001+ trees (20% of the sample in this research) make a slim margin, because their cost of production is below the average and below the floor price.
Figure 2: CoP/KG Cherry by Number of Trees with the 2016 cherry floor price
Based on these findings, stakeholders in Rwanda might look at other aspects of those with very few coffee trees, such as the inability to join cooperatives due to the fact that membership usually requires a minimum number of trees. A minimum tree requirement of 200 – 300 trees is common.  On average, cooperative membership has been shown to significantly correlate with lower cost of production in Rwanda (see section 6.2 of the report). With a holistic look at the situation of the “smallest of the small” farms, appropriate and specific interventions that would help create profitable scenarios for these farmers could be designed. 

Conclusion
Hopefully, these few highlights give a glimpse as to why understanding cost of production can be valuable. I know it has helped me as an importer to have confidence in my contracting methods and ways in which I interact with the producer organizations from which I buy. I tend to have a lot more emphasis on the cherry price paid to the farmer than other buying groups. Since I understand average cost of production is around 177 RWF/kg cherry (in some areas I have more numbers more specific for that exact geographic area), I push hard to get at least 300 Rwf/kg cherry to the farmer, roughly $1.50/lb green (using foreign exchange rate of 790, as used in the year the thesis was written). 300 Rwf/Kg cherry is the value the farmers told us in the survey was the value that they need to be profitable. As a buyer, I can see 300 Rwf/kg offers a reasonable gross margin to the farmer (30-40%), even those who are small farmers with CoP much higher than 177/Rwf/kg. We believe in the benefits that come to everyone in the supply chain when farmers are compensated for all the risk and effort required to grow great, specialty grade coffee, year after year.

Questions?
Have questions about cost of production? Please contact us at rachurch@artisancoffeeimports.com .

Monday, January 6, 2020

93. It Pays to be a Member - Cooperatives Research

January 6, 2020
From 2015- 2018 the USAID Africa Great Lakes Coffee (AGLC) support program funded ground-breaking research in Rwanda. We'd like to share the findings from this research in a series of blogs - welcome to the first one! All the publications from the project can be found on the website of the lead partner for the project, Michigan State University (MSU): CLICK HERE for publication list.

Published October 5, 2016, the paper titled "Role of Cooperatives on Adoption of Best Management Practices & Productivity in Rwanda Coffee Sector" brings an analysis that can only be accomplished with a primary dataset that is large. The dataset for this paper is from 1024 coffee farmer households randomly selected in four different coffee-growing districts: Gakenke, Rutsiro, Huye and Kirehe.

The lead author is David Ortega, a young, exciting faculty member of MSU's College of Agricultural and Natural Resources. Much of David's past work has been in China, in particular with the meat industry and safety standards. His quantitative 'ag econ' work is recognized widely and he brought the AGLC research team his unique experience and skills in experimental design for surveys.

The co-authors on the paper include: Aniseh Bro, (then a Ph.D. student, now teaches at Appalachia State University); Daniel Clay, (then professor of Community Sustainability at MSU, now consultant); Maria Claudia Lopez (professor of Community Sustainability at MSU), Alfred Bizoza (then director of IPAR in Rwanda, now a professor at the University of Rwanda); and yours truly, Ruth Ann Church, (then masters student in Community Sustainability, now working full-time in coffee with the sheepskin in hand!)